<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What we spend on bottled water vs. people who need safe water</title>
	<link>http://water1st.org/waterlog/2007/07/05/bottled-water-vs-people-who-need-safe-water/</link>
	<description>waterlog: the water blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Marla</title>
		<link>http://water1st.org/waterlog/2007/07/05/bottled-water-vs-people-who-need-safe-water/#comment-3908</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://water1st.org/waterlog/2007/07/05/bottled-water-vs-people-who-need-safe-water/#comment-3908</guid>
					<description>Hi John.  This is a great summary of the major bottled water issues.  Do you know the Pacific Institute?  They issued a good report a few years ago called "The New Economy of Water."  Here's a link if you are interested:
http://www.pacinst.org/reports/new_economy_of_water/

Also, there was a recent article in the Christian Science Monitor.  It's not the best article I have read on this topic, but on the last page there's a pretty frightening statement:
"Water-sector analyst Joseph DiLillo at the Shemano Group in Los Angeles likes California water utilities because they're some of the few in the country that actually own the water they sell."
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0625/p14s01-wmgn.html?page=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John.  This is a great summary of the major bottled water issues.  Do you know the Pacific Institute?  They issued a good report a few years ago called &#8220;The New Economy of Water.&#8221;  Here&#8217;s a link if you are interested:<br />
<a href='http://www.pacinst.org/reports/new_economy_of_water/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.pacinst.org/reports/new_economy_of_water/</a></p>
<p>Also, there was a recent article in the Christian Science Monitor.  It&#8217;s not the best article I have read on this topic, but on the last page there&#8217;s a pretty frightening statement:<br />
&#8220;Water-sector analyst Joseph DiLillo at the Shemano Group in Los Angeles likes California water utilities because they&#8217;re some of the few in the country that actually own the water they sell.&#8221;<br />
<a href='http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0625/p14s01-wmgn.html?page=1' rel='nofollow'>http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0625/p14s01-wmgn.html?page=1</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Riess</title>
		<link>http://water1st.org/waterlog/2007/07/05/bottled-water-vs-people-who-need-safe-water/#comment-3900</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://water1st.org/waterlog/2007/07/05/bottled-water-vs-people-who-need-safe-water/#comment-3900</guid>
					<description>Here's a few additional comments retrieved from a rapid review of the issue on the web about two years ago, before the recent news that the "spring" and "mountain fresh" water being peddled is really tap water.

- industry growing at enormous rate 
- demand for water means aquifers are being lowered and/or depleted 
- demand means private companies are managing to privatize water 
    supplies in US and overseas, meaning that this absolutely critical 
    resource is being handed over to companies beholden to wall street 
    and to profit and there is great potential that the poor will be unable to 
    afford water in the future 
- bottled water's ad campaign undermines the purity, flavor, and 
    appearance of muni water supplies and undermines the tax base and 
    the political will to maintain pure, tasty, good looking muni water 
    distribution systems 
- the bottled water industry is regulated by FDA and there's minimal 
    administration of the FDA oversight whereas EPA regulates municipal 
    systems that are tested regularly 
- the quality of bottled water is actually so unregulated that it is notorious 
    for its poor quality 
- the bottles used for bottled water if reused are reportedly emitting 
    carcinogenic gases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a few additional comments retrieved from a rapid review of the issue on the web about two years ago, before the recent news that the &#8220;spring&#8221; and &#8220;mountain fresh&#8221; water being peddled is really tap water.</p>
<p>- industry growing at enormous rate<br />
- demand for water means aquifers are being lowered and/or depleted<br />
- demand means private companies are managing to privatize water<br />
    supplies in US and overseas, meaning that this absolutely critical<br />
    resource is being handed over to companies beholden to wall street<br />
    and to profit and there is great potential that the poor will be unable to<br />
    afford water in the future<br />
- bottled water&#8217;s ad campaign undermines the purity, flavor, and<br />
    appearance of muni water supplies and undermines the tax base and<br />
    the political will to maintain pure, tasty, good looking muni water<br />
    distribution systems<br />
- the bottled water industry is regulated by FDA and there&#8217;s minimal<br />
    administration of the FDA oversight whereas EPA regulates municipal<br />
    systems that are tested regularly<br />
- the quality of bottled water is actually so unregulated that it is notorious<br />
    for its poor quality<br />
- the bottles used for bottled water if reused are reportedly emitting<br />
    carcinogenic gases.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
